![]() The NYT, by contrast, is almost always on its best behaviour. It would be invidious to privilege either the UK or the US style of crosswording for better or worse, the ones Sinatra did would be more appropriate training for Who Wants To Be A Millionaire than they would for Bletchley Park.Ī more interesting difference is one of morality, or perhaps of manners.īritish cryptics can offer all kinds of suggestive and salacious imagery, as spotted here each week in our crossword roundups. (There's a fascinating look at how the NYT puzzle comes together in a recent piece in the Atlantic about its indomitable editor Will Shortz.) For the NYT, the solver needs a mix of approaches involving more general knowledge and non-English vocab, and much less wordplay. ![]() It's worth remembering that the New York Times puzzle is not made of the same stuff as British broadsheet cryptics. For me, it's not surprising that Sinatra sat down sometimes, or that he enjoyed word puzzles. The Mirror plays the story as a surprise, headlining it Womaniser Frank Sinatra Liked Nothing More than Sitting Down to do a Crossword. It's an arresting image: Ol' Clue Eyes asking Dean Martin for help with a sticky acrostic while shouting at Sammy Davis Jr for failing to fetch the Chairman of the Board his favourite pencil. What a wonderful way to pass the time and also learn new answers every day. The Sunday puzzle is completed in 90 to 120 minutes. Today I would say a daily puzzle is completed in 30 to 40 minutes. ![]() Sinatra describes how he got hooked, and how he made a regular challenge to himself to solve more quickly: The hook is a recent Sinatra memorabilia auction, including a 1989 typewritten love letter from crooner to crossword editor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |